<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>CostPerNews - Latest Comments in http://www.costpernews.com/archives/ad-spending-predictions-dire-but-what-about-peformance/</title><link>http://costpernews.disqus.com/</link><description>The Leading Performance Marketing Blog!</description><atom:link href="https://costpernews.disqus.com/thread_079/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 11:01:19 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: http://www.costpernews.com/archives/ad-spending-predictions-dire-but-what-about-peformance/</title><link>http://www.costpernews.com/archives/ad-spending-predictions-dire-but-what-about-peformance/#comment-4051191</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was reading an article a couple days ago in the paper based on the eMarketer report, and I was annoyed at the broad brush that didn't distinguish performance from the over-priced, non-performance advertising.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thought about writing a letter to the editor, but then remembered I chastised the author on the same sort of omission 2 weeks ago and she was unmoved.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shawn Collins</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 11:01:19 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>