<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>CostPerNews - Latest Comments in General</title><link>http://costpernews.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 21:57:06 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: http://www.costpernews.com/2008/05/12/affiliate-summit-discount-flights/</title><link>http://www.costpernews.com/2008/05/12/affiliate-summit-discount-flights/#comment-453077</link><description>I went ahead and booked based on this - I'm excited as this will be my first time flying JetBlue AND my first time with a nonstop coast-to-coast flight.  Here's to hoping the facilities aren't that bad for such a long flight - I may have to make another first!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TrishaLyn</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 21:57:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: eBay Leaves Commission Junction, Starting eBay Partner Network</title><link>http://www.costpernews.com/2008/03/17/ebay-leaves-commission-junction-starting-ebay-partner-network/#comment-449737</link><description>After a month of EPN being live there are some major issues related to commission reporting.  CJ did an average job, but so far EPN is getting failing marks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Richard Brown</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 12:54:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are All the New Folks Gone Yet?</title><link>http://www.costpernews.com/2008/05/01/are-all-the-new-folks-gone-yet/#comment-443936</link><description>Stay indie Sam. Time for podcast imho. Shotgun blast...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wayne Porter</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 21:33:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Affiliate Summit Social Network Could Actually Be Useful</title><link>http://www.costpernews.com/2008/05/08/new-affiliate-summit-social-network-could-actually-be-useful/#comment-435950</link><description>I'm excited about Ning - I almost went with them last time, but was seduced by Confabb being the "social network for conferences."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Amazing how much easier some small things are with Ning that were a real hassle on Confabb.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">affiliatetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 04:54:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Affiliate Summit Social Network Could Actually Be Useful</title><link>http://www.costpernews.com/2008/05/08/new-affiliate-summit-social-network-could-actually-be-useful/#comment-434836</link><description>I jumped on and I'm really liking it so far.  It's super easy to customize on a user level and really clean to read and understand.  I'm going to like this SO much more than Confabb!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TrishaLyn</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 22:58:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Angel is the New ReveNews Editor</title><link>http://www.costpernews.com/2008/05/05/angel-is-the-new-revenews-editor/#comment-432987</link><description>Thanks Sam, I really appreciate the support and hope you will still engage in the occasional fray there. It would be a real loss not to have your voice be part of the discussion.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Angel Djambazov</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 17:29:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pressroom Theme for Wordpress</title><link>http://www.costpernews.com/2008/05/07/pressroom-theme-for-wordpress/#comment-431309</link><description>Thanks for the write-up.  Be on the lookout for additional social media newsroom WordPress Themes from Fathom in the future!  We'd love to hear feedback or see examples from anyone that is using the Theme.  &lt;a href="mailto:pressroom@fathomseo.com"&gt;pressroom@fathomseo.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kurt Krejny</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 12:24:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Todd Crawford&amp;#8217;s New Blog</title><link>http://www.costpernews.com/2008/05/07/todd-crawfords-new-blog/#comment-428858</link><description>first! you misspelled "affiliate" in your tag</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tcrawford</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 20:48:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Get a .Me Domain</title><link>http://www.costpernews.com/2008/05/06/get-a-me-domain/#comment-427122</link><description>Yeah, I jumped the gun and thought I was registering them in my late night euphoria.  Turns out I was paying to play in the actual registration.  Didn't realize that until this morning and the title of the App Scout post didn't help my confusion.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">samharrelson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:58:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Some Merchants Removing NY Affiliates?</title><link>http://www.costpernews.com/2008/05/06/some-merchants-removing-ny-affiliates/#comment-427104</link><description>Yeah, couldn't believe a merchant is out there already dropping affiliates.  I would take a wait and see approach, think they're jumping the gun a little.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jonathan (Trust)</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:55:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Get a .Me Domain</title><link>http://www.costpernews.com/2008/05/06/get-a-me-domain/#comment-427096</link><description>How are you getting those?  I thought the open to all auction starts on June 6 and right now just for those with trademarks registered before June 28.   And:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;May 6 - May 20, 2008: General Sunrise &lt;br&gt;May 20 - June 6, 2008: Quiet Period &lt;br&gt;June 6 - June 26, 2008: Land Rush &lt;br&gt;June 26 - July 17, 2008: Quiet Period &lt;br&gt;July 17, 2008: Open Registration &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;Trying to figure all that out.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jonathan (TrustO</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:54:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Track and Twitter Abuse</title><link>http://www.costpernews.com/2008/05/06/twitter-track-and-twitter-abuse/#comment-426875</link><description>"And of course I track my own name in case someone I’m not following, etc tweets me so that I can see them and respond."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Prokofy-&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Because of your past performances on the Gillmor Gang and the GetSatisfaction forum, I'm not going to engage you beyond pointing out that in all of your unnecessary rhetoric, you should also consider closer reading before jumping to your keyboard (and perhaps listen more).  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All Best-&lt;br&gt;Sam</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">samharrelson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:17:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Track and Twitter Abuse</title><link>http://www.costpernews.com/2008/05/06/twitter-track-and-twitter-abuse/#comment-426755</link><description>I'm  not a "supporter" of this creepy stalker and manipulator of social media.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I make exactly the same point as you do, when you say: "lease understand that I have absolutely no problem with protests, satire, uncomfortable demonstrations with a sharp edge of irony, etc. There is a needed place for those sorts of things in every aspect of society, especially something like Twitter where the micro nature of the platform often engenders a feeling of unnecessary importance (even more so than Techmeme and the blogosphere)."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I just put it in practice, unlike you.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You are organizing a vanity feed (you forgot to mention you also track your own name!) and that's fine, but...you don't HAVE to do that, as I've explained over and over again.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If the granularity for G-talk and/or Twitter isn't "there" yet, don't nerf the entire system and make it incomprehensible and crippled as a system just because of your own very subjective needs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You, like others in this thread, seem incapable of conceptually thinking about Twitter a as a system, and how it will be affected when ever single subjectivity starts massively blocking people they hate, and then moving in packs and using hitlists.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As I've explained, it leads to massive invisibility of legitimate dissent especialy by top-level news aggregators. It leads to clumsy axes wielded against people innocently re-tweeting merely because they followed something and then retweeted their thought to their own circle of followers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But I don't expect you to understand these subtleties because it seems more important to brand me falsely as a supporter of @panopticons and pretend that the mob that shows up in a thread like that, a tiny percentage of Twitter users and thinkers, can lynch the devs into nerfing something.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As it happened, Twitter deleted the panopticons account.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, they didn't install the nerfing feature yet enabling people to put blocks within track. And I hope that's because they aren't being hasty about crippling their social media platform as a whole.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think it's just ducky  that you and some other A-listers and hangers-on think you can; run a thing like Twitter. But you'll come to see that disruptive media is disruptive *of you, too*.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Prokofy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 14:55:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Track and Twitter Abuse</title><link>http://www.costpernews.com/2008/05/06/twitter-track-and-twitter-abuse/#comment-426265</link><description>Looks like the Twitter gods zapped @panopticons:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"(Prokofy): Ok the Twitter managers removed @panopticons which you can still read in &lt;a href="http://tweetscan.com"&gt;tweetscan.com&lt;/a&gt; but can't tell if they nerfed "track" yet w "block""&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Happy ending.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">samharrelson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 13:34:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Get a .Me Domain</title><link>http://www.costpernews.com/2008/05/06/get-a-me-domain/#comment-424578</link><description>They're pretty expensive ($98 for 2 years minimum) but I've grabbed a couple of nice ones already!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">samharrelson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 03:02:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Get a .Me Domain</title><link>http://www.costpernews.com/2008/05/06/get-a-me-domain/#comment-424569</link><description>That is bad ass.... I totally want one.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TrishaLyn</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 03:00:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Some Merchants Removing NY Affiliates?</title><link>http://www.costpernews.com/2008/05/06/some-merchants-removing-ny-affiliates/#comment-423817</link><description>Wow that sucks.  It's already messed up enough that the affiliate has to face repercussions tax-wise on their affiliate income, but then to be dropped as well?  Harsh.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TrishaLyn</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 00:53:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Xobni Open to the Public</title><link>http://www.costpernews.com/2008/05/05/xonbi-open-to-the-public/#comment-420083</link><description>I have been using xobni for a while now and really enjoy using it. The wealth of information it provides is at times amazing !!! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thx&lt;br&gt;Veena</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Veena B</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 10:55:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Anne Kadet&amp;#8217;s Analysis Falls Very Short</title><link>http://www.costpernews.com/2008/05/01/anne-kadets-analysis-falls-very-short/#comment-413374</link><description>Sam thank you for this post. Well said. We need to  to making sure our affiliate marketing community thrives and is represented properly. It is a very effective means of marketing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Bordes</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 16:24:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Videoclix.tv Is the Future?</title><link>http://www.costpernews.com/2008/05/01/videoclixtv-is-the-future/#comment-412495</link><description>Auto-play video is awful. If that's the future, I'm going retro.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">affiliatetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 04:28:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Anne Kadet&amp;#8217;s Analysis Falls Very Short</title><link>http://www.costpernews.com/2008/05/01/anne-kadets-analysis-falls-very-short/#comment-410009</link><description>meow...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Missy Ward</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 01:17:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are All the New Folks Gone Yet?</title><link>http://www.costpernews.com/2008/05/01/are-all-the-new-folks-gone-yet/#comment-407008</link><description>Glad to hear that CPN hasn't reached "the end"  - looking forward to the new posts!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Amy Ely</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 14:30:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Videoclix.tv Is the Future?</title><link>http://www.costpernews.com/2008/05/01/videoclixtv-is-the-future/#comment-406171</link><description>Pretty cool.  I can forsee"TV" shows and movies online with product placement combined with clickable links now.  Interesting...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Oliver</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 08:54:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Anne Kadet&amp;#8217;s Analysis Falls Very Short</title><link>http://www.costpernews.com/2008/05/01/anne-kadets-analysis-falls-very-short/#comment-405877</link><description>Personally I loved Missy's take on it... scathing sarcasm that only another woman can offer lol.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TrishaLyn</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 04:53:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Videoclix.tv Is the Future?</title><link>http://www.costpernews.com/2008/05/01/videoclixtv-is-the-future/#comment-405875</link><description>That is PIMP... I totally signed up for a beta invite... fingers crossed that I get one :D</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TrishaLyn</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 04:53:06 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>