<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>CostPerNews - Latest Comments in Google SearchWiki And Custom SERPs: Ruh-Roh Affiliates?</title><link>http://costpernews.disqus.com/</link><description>The Leading Performance Marketing Blog!</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:27:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google SearchWiki And Custom SERPs: Ruh-Roh Affiliates?</title><link>http://www.costpernews.com/archives/google-searchwiki-and-custom-serps-ruh-roh-affiliates/#comment-19270267</link><description>this google feature is interesting just like wikipedia, you can edit article that has low traffic.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rozeme2</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:27:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google SearchWiki And Custom SERPs: Ruh-Roh Affiliates?</title><link>http://www.costpernews.com/archives/google-searchwiki-and-custom-serps-ruh-roh-affiliates/#comment-3931045</link><description>This is more of a personalized search feature than a "social" one. Quoting from the google blog - "The changes you make only affect your own searches".&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sure, it's a step in the right direction by google, but one can't still call it a full-fledged wikified search interface. one has to log in to their account to view the changes they have done to their own searches. To fully wikify google will be a much more complicated task, near-impossible, considering the fact that it will have to be made in a way that it can't be gamed.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pranavchavda</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:51:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google SearchWiki And Custom SERPs: Ruh-Roh Affiliates?</title><link>http://www.costpernews.com/archives/google-searchwiki-and-custom-serps-ruh-roh-affiliates/#comment-3922453</link><description>I'm just grinding an axe.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But seriously, I think web users (especially in terms of tasks like&lt;br&gt;"searching") are increasingly looking away from the right side of the screen&lt;br&gt;(esp on SERPS) and relying much more heavily on reviews or referrals from&lt;br&gt;other users or communities.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just speculation since I have no real data to back that up with, though.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">samharrelson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:05:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google SearchWiki And Custom SERPs: Ruh-Roh Affiliates?</title><link>http://www.costpernews.com/archives/google-searchwiki-and-custom-serps-ruh-roh-affiliates/#comment-3922413</link><description>I think the weakest affiliate and non-affiliate sites have long since had poor SERPs. This will be an interesting thing to watch. This is a slight step in the direction of "quality variety" with different results for different people or at different times.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brook Schaaf</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:02:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google SearchWiki And Custom SERPs: Ruh-Roh Affiliates?</title><link>http://www.costpernews.com/archives/google-searchwiki-and-custom-serps-ruh-roh-affiliates/#comment-3922355</link><description>I see how this could effect thin sites who rely on organic traffic, but what effect would it have on PPC affiliates?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">quityourdayjob</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:58:40 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>