<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>CostPerNews - Latest Comments in Does PageRank Still Matter?</title><link>http://costpernews.disqus.com/</link><description>The Leading Performance Marketing Blog!</description><atom:link href="https://costpernews.disqus.com/does_pagerank_still_matter/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 06:35:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Does PageRank Still Matter?</title><link>http://www.costpernews.com/archives/does-pagerank-still-matter/#comment-4812999</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I tend to agree, ONLY because my blog's PR is 2... yet my twitter page's PR is freakin' 9... something ain't right...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TrishaLyn</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 06:35:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does PageRank Still Matter?</title><link>http://www.costpernews.com/archives/does-pagerank-still-matter/#comment-4801111</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I actually agree with you. It's pointless. Google has taken great steps to make it so.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jim Kukral</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 14:04:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does PageRank Still Matter?</title><link>http://www.costpernews.com/archives/does-pagerank-still-matter/#comment-4800383</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Long live Page Rank! &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Evan W.</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 13:12:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does PageRank Still Matter?</title><link>http://www.costpernews.com/archives/does-pagerank-still-matter/#comment-4801182</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yep, agreed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, PR is completely wrapped up in the workings of the web (at least on&lt;br&gt;the advertising side).  Explaining to affiliate managers, marketing&lt;br&gt;directors, etc that PageRank is pretty worthless is a difficult task.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sam Harrelson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 13:10:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does PageRank Still Matter?</title><link>http://www.costpernews.com/archives/does-pagerank-still-matter/#comment-4799104</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I would much rather google again hide the pagerank values for all websites. What exactly is gained for them to expose this data other than people trying to sell links and increase perceived site value?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Improving The Web</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 11:40:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does PageRank Still Matter?</title><link>http://www.costpernews.com/archives/does-pagerank-still-matter/#comment-4799039</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Page Rank has never mattered outside of link sales.  And the only reason it mattered then was because it was a convenient catchall way to identify link value for the lazy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Google knows it's PR system is too effed (for the reasons you mentioned among others) to have any real use, so worrying about it is a complete waste of time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">matt</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 11:35:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does PageRank Still Matter?</title><link>http://www.costpernews.com/archives/does-pagerank-still-matter/#comment-4799312</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good point.  It is nice for personal vanity reasons (and to help explain why&lt;br&gt;some things get ranked above others).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But yeah... damn marketers ruin everything.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sam Harrelson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 10:52:13 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>